|
A
recent Ontario case clarified the law relating to Home Inspection
clauses. In "Marshall vs. Bernard Place Corporation",
the Buyer included a condition of obtaining a home inspection report
'satisfactory to him in his sole and absolute discretion'.
The
report stated that the house was 'well built, needing no major repairs'.
There were however some minor deficiencies, which the Buyer was
not willing to accept. The Buyer relied on the clause and wanted
out of the deal. The Seller refused to refund the deposit, saying
that the Buyer had not acted reasonably, honestly or in good faith.
The
judge found that the clause was so broad as to come close to being
an option - subject to the Buyer acting reasonably , honestly and
in good faith. The judge felt that the Buyer had acted reasonably,
honestly and in good faith and found in favour of the Buyer.
|